Preaching Peace Lectionary

3 Easter, Year A

Gospel Anthropological Reading

I suspect Kierkegaard would have loved today’s text from the Gospel of Luke. It is about misrecognition and the grounding of true cognition. Ricouer, I think, would point out the structure of this misrecognition. Both would have observed the alterity (‘otherness’) of Jesus. When Karl Barth was a young pastor, he also wrote about the problem of our misrecognition of God and spoke of God as ‘wholly other than’ the god of our religion.

It is rather astonishing how Jesus is misrecognized today. Luke’s gospel gives us an important clue as to why this misrecognition occurs and also shows us the means by which true recognition takes place.

It is a simple story in its basics. Two men are walking home. Their lives have been turned upside down over the death of a friend. More so, they have heard bizarre tales being told about him. They can’t figure it out. Along the way they meet a stranger who inquires about their conversation and who subsequently puts everything into perspective, first through his interpretation of Scripture, then through a idiom of personal action. Suddenly, everything is clear.

First let’s discuss the phenomenon of misrecognition as it occurs christologically. The two men have a fundamental belief they express ”but we had hoped he (Jesus) was the one who was going to redeem Israel.” It is plain to see that a certain expectation was held here. Jesus was hoped to be the mighty go’el, the redeemer of God. There was a certain ‘otherness’ to the person and work of Jesus, so much so that it could only be contexted in the light of the end where this ‘otherness’ was the stuff of the new beginning, the eschatological age to come. All of this was viewed through the lens of a ‘promissory history’ (Moltmann), a history of the people who belonged to this ‘other God.’ In short, Jesus was perceived through the specific lens of apocalyptic, literature that had an emphasis on the end.

We do not need to pidgeonhole these ‘messianic beliefs’ into disparate and discrete systems, son of man, second adam, Christ, the prophet, etc. Most important was what had occurred in ancient Jewish messianism with the formulation of a view of Messiah as a political redeemer who achieved victory through the use of force/power. The people were not wrong to have such high expectations of Jesus. Where he disappointed them was precisely in his inability or unwillingness to defend himself, to achieve victory with shock and awe. He let himself get killed. Fool. God’s emissary would never let that happen. God is all powerful, so also would his agent be. It did not occur to Jesus’ followers that he would choose to not use this potential power in his own defense or in retribution.

Jesus’ vulnerability is the veil behind which God hides. Jesus’ openness to love and forgive is the camouflage of the heart of God. If we are going to talk about a hidden God in Christianity (dues absconditus), then let us acknowledge that this God is benevolent in every way, This is the One in whom there is ‘no shadow of turning.’ Jesus is misrecognized because we do not see that suffering is not just an experience, it is a hermeneutic. When we do not understand that ‘the Christ must suffer’, when we are afraid to speak of God who suffers with us in love, when we refuse to suffer and most especially when we ignore the suffering of others, we remain blind, unable to see God at work.

This blindness, this inability to recognize will not only be talked about, it will be demonstrated from pulpits everywhere when this Sunday some preachers will focus on Jesus’ use of Scripture and conclude he was justifying a theory of inspiration that they then can twist and distort into silly putty gods. A god like every other god, a god that is not truly different, truly distinguished, truly Holy. They will still preach a god of power and might, a god above time, space and humanity. A god above matter, a truly Gnostic divinity, a god who does not, cannot and will not suffer. No, their god, their Christ comes with power, force, death, and vengeance.

Not so, Jesus says. It is the suffering Christ, the suffering God by which Scripture is to be interpreted. This is the emphasis Jesus gives to the biblical text. Do otherwise and you will be walking along a road full of questions (which is what most do and why most are where they are). Jesus gives the perspective of the suffering victim. Jesus addressed death.

Death is the one reality we all face, it is the one reality from which we run our fastest. At our healthiest, we do not choose to suffer, nor to be abandoned, alienated, hated, mocked, insulted and murdered. Yet we constantly inflict all of this on others when we non-consciously engage in scapegoating others, blaming others. This is our human dilemma. It is the place in which we are blinder than bats. It is the place from which our collective self deception originates. Because we refuse to acknowledge that we victimize others, in thought, word and deed we fail to see that we too would victimize Jesus were he here today? How so?

Matthew’s gospel gives us a strategic clue. It is found in the parable of the sheep and the goats in Matthew 25. It is the final element of the pre-Matthean passion narrative. It says that Jesus is to be recognized in our scapegoats. Yours, mine, ours. This tendency we have toward the pulsating heart of violent death, to make our life better by getting rid of others is true of virtually everybody, it is the virus infecting humanity. We are oriented to death and we are in denial about it because we are the cause of death. We are in service to death, we obey its every command.

Jesus comes to us to help us see that until we hear with this hermeneutic from below, until we see from this theology of the Cross, we will continue to misrecognize and thus misrepresent both Jesus and the One he knew as his Daddy.

However, when we do acknowledge that the perspective which reveals is the perspective of the innocent forgiving victim, a true miracle occurs. Luke tells us that Jesus went on with these men and ended up planning to stay with them. At the meal the four fold action, take-bless-break-give, the Eucharistic action (Dom Gregory Dix), the action of the feeding of the masses (Fuchs), this four fold action opens their eyes to see and their ears to hear and they recognize that even in their state of misrecognition they had a huge desire to believe that his interpretation was true, ‘their hearts burned.’ This four fold action is the paradigm of Jesus’ life, the way he would have us interpret his life. It is his life that God chooses to take, bless, break and give. This self-giving of the Parent of the universe, for us humans and our salvation, ought to just astonish us.

True cognition of Jesus takes place when we as a Christian community gather round our sacred victim and acknowledge what we are doing, the symbolic ritual activity of mob cannibalism. This is the Eucharist. This is where, even as we re-enact the murder of Jesus, we are told we are forgiven. If we would do this to Jesus, we would certainly do it to others. And we do, and knowing this, we can also choose to no longer participate in processes that lead to death. We become aware that we are the Forgiven Ones. We have come under the reign of Life. We become the Forgiving Ones. And this is the joy of Eastertide. “It is true, the Lord is risen and has appeared to Simon.”

Back to top

 

Gospel Historical/Cultural Questions

No comments today.

Back to top

 

Gospel So What?

We Christians are the most joyous of all people, for we know that Jesus is risen, God has not abandoned us, neither as a species nor as individuals. The fact is, even in our sin, we are included in God’s good process of creation, an on going activity that will one day culminate. And indeed the judgment of our God will be, as it was in the beginning, that it is all ‘very, very good.’

We stand forgiven. Before God, before the universe, before every animal, mineral or vegetable, before each other, we stand forgiven. God has brought all under judgment in order that God might have mercy upon all. Breaking bread together, forgiving each other, practicing peace and peace making with one another teaches us how to live in and with the world. Without our Eucharist, apart from our gratitude we are lost. But with joy and gratitude for God’s grace, our Eucharist is a celebration of Jesus opening our eyes to see (our victimizing), our ears to hear (the cries of the suffering), and the turning of hearts of stone to caring and compassion. We can live now as we will live then.

Back to top

 

Epistle Anthropological Reading

This section of this particular page is not yet completed, but will be done a few weeks before the Sunday in question. It will be the heart of the discussion, offering an anthropological (“Girardian”) reflection on the lectionary texts. It will be complemmented by the other sections, but this will be the primary material.Back to top

 

Epistle Historical/Cultural Questions

This section of this particular page is not yet complete. In it, there will be materials pertinent to the historical/cultural setting of the texts under consideration, to the extent that they contribute to a non-violent understanding of the text. (We won’t re-hash historical/cultural materials that are well known and add nothing to the “peace” discussion.)Back to top

 

Epistle So What?

The “so what” section for each week will go here. Less scholarly, more reflective. In this section, we’ll try to give our answer to the questions, “Okay, that anthropological stuff is nice, but “so what?” How do I use this in a sermon? How do I relate this to my congregation’s world?”Back to top